Workspaces and roles
Separate workspaces with role-based access, so teams and regions do not share a namespace.
For enterprise teams
Mandatory training completed in a second language is attendance, not comprehension. Octavia localizes training, onboarding and internal communication at volume, under the controls a security review expects.
The specific reasons this content usually stays in one language.
A signature sheet proves a video was played, not that the instruction landed.
Per-minute agency rates mean most internal content is never localized at all.
Pre-announcement material and real case examples cannot go just anywhere.
The parts of the platform that matter for this work, rather than the full feature list.
Separate workspaces with role-based access, so teams and regions do not share a namespace.
SSO, encryption in transit and at rest, configurable retention, and content that is not used to train models.
One approved glossary applied everywhere, so a policy or system name never renders two different ways.
Programmatic submission for libraries measured in hundreds of hours rather than single assets.
Transcript and translation approved before generation, with the artefacts an audit expects.
Captions and transcripts alongside translated audio, in each language you publish.
Four steps from the file you already have to every language you need.
Upload or submit programmatically from the systems you already use.
Approved terminology, product names and regulated phrasing pinned across every job.
In-market reviewers approve text before any audio is generated.
Deliver to your LMS and record what was delivered, in which language, to whom.
One upload in, every format you need to publish out.
Including the ones where the honest answer is a limitation.
No. That position is documented rather than verbal, which is what a security review will ask for. Alongside it: configurable retention, encryption in transit and at rest, role-based access with single sign-on, and a defined processing region where you require one.
Record the language of delivery in the training record, assess in the language of instruction rather than the source language, and revalidate assessment items per language — translation can make a distractor obviously wrong or accidentally correct. In an investigation the question is whether that individual received comprehensible instruction.
Yes, through batch processing and API submission. The practical constraint at that scale is rarely processing — it is review capacity, terminology maturity and versioning. Expect review effort per hour to fall substantially as the glossary matures.
Internal training, onboarding and safety content. It carries real volume, has no external brand exposure, and its effect is measurable in completion rates, assessment scores and incident data. Regulated customer-facing material should come last, once terminology and review are proven.
Practical guides from the Octavia editorial team.
The same engine, pointed at a different kind of work.
Start with the training that carries the most risk if it is misunderstood.